RSS feed Add to your Facebook page LinkedIn Watch us on Youtube

Activity title

Occupant Injury Assessment Methods for Mine/IED Protection Levels of Vehicles

Activity Reference

HFM-379

Panel

HFM

Security Classification

NATO UNCLASSIFIED

Status

Active

Activity type

RTG

Start date

2024-04-24T00:00:00Z

End date

2027-04-24T00:00:00Z

Keywords

IED, Injury criteria, Mine, Occupant loading, STANAG4569, Test procedure, Vehicle

Background

Protection of the vehicle occupants against both Anti-Vehicle (AV) mines and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) is a main consideration in vehicle design and in NATO Standards. The STANAG 4569, Protection Levels For Occupants Of Armoured Vehicles, addresses the mine and IED protection levels for the qualification of vehicles. Injury assessment methods and the test protocol, injury criteria and tolerance levels are included, based on the efforts of HFM-090/TG-25 (2001-2004), HFM-RTG-148 (2006-2009), HFM-RTG-198 (2010-2013) and HFM-RTG-271 (2017-2021). The last RTG, HFM-RTG-271, recommended new injury criteria for four body parts, identified a new, currently in development, injury assessment methodology for standing vehicle occupants, discussed the feasibility of a transfer function between two currently accepted test surrogates, highlighted a, previously unidentified, major factor for reproducible testing, and updated the test and injury assessment protocol. These results have been used by the STANAG 4569 Team of Experts (ToE) to define and update AEP-55 volume 2 Procedures For Evaluating The Protection Level Of Armoured Vehicles – Mine Threat, and AEP-55 volume 3, Procedures For Evaluating The Protection Level Of Armoured Vehicles – IED Threats. Despite the HFM efforts, there are still ToE questions that remain unanswered. In addition, the military population is changing, notably with the inclusion of women in ground close combat, and vehicle platforms are being updated, including the introduction of new protective technologies. Meanwhile, new research in these topics is being published. Therefore, examination of current research data and newly available combat and test data can help in addressing remaining new questions related to the protection of vehicle occupants; they will enable the update of current injury criteria, injury assessment methods and test procedures.

Objectives

The objective is to define appropriate injury criteria and injury assessment methods for occupants of armoured vehicles against AV-mine and IED threats, in line with the priorities set by the STANAG 4569 ToE. These priorities are:? Lumbar spine injury criterion: investigate a possible transfer from DRI to a force-based criterion; ? Lower leg injury criterion: investigate the possibility of adding flexural loading to the injury criteria;? Upper leg injury criterion: investigate the inclusion of a femur shear injury criterion;? Posture: recommendations for injury criteria and assessment method (including the ATD) for addressing occupants in the standing position;? Anthropometry: recommendations for use of ATD anthropometries other than the 50th percentile, notably the 5th and 95th percentile;? Injury severity: recommendations on assessment methods of more severe injuries than what is currently in the standard;? Fragment injury criteria: recommendations on injury criteria at additional abbreviated injury scales levels specific for behind armour debris.The RTG will address these priorities, reflect the state of science and, when possible, will merge results into recommendations for the STANAG 4569 ToE. Additionally, the RTG will address gaps identified by the RTG members and will collate and analyse available other research results to advise the ToE.The results will be based on available and ongoing research, and on available live-fire and laboratory data produced by the member nations. The results and recommendations will be merged in a technical report, written so as to advise the STANAG 4569 ToE and to inform the wider NATO community.

Topics

Analysis of existing and emerging data on occupant response and human injury performance from biomechanics research with military focus, such as the US WIAMan program;• Investigation and/or development of appropriate injury criteria, for specific body parts, anthropometry and injury severity, as listed in the STANAG 4569 ToE priorities;• Examination of injury assessment methods and detailing of the test procedures for the STANAG 4569 ToE priorities, to include the effects of posture and anthropometry. Additionally, review and, when possible, improve parts of the current injury assessment methods, such as data acquisition, effects of personal protective equipment, and temperature effects.

Contact Panel Office